Minnesota NOW Logo

 

Minnesota NOW

Feb. 2000 Legislative Updates/Action Alerts
Rachel Callanan, 
Minnesota NOW Legislative Coordinator

|HOME| CALENDAR | ACTION | LEGISLATIVE | MN NOW TIMES | ACTIVIST LINKS | SITE MAP |

|LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND | POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE| NATIONAL NOW

A 3-1-00 Economic Justice update has been added.

The 2000 Legislative Session started Feb. 1st, and the Legislative Committee is hard at work.  Kathy Murphy, who recently returned to Minnesota from living in Washington, DC was recently appointed Legislative Committee Chair by MN NOW's Executive Committee. She has hit the ground running in her new role. Kathy is also working as an intern lobbyist with Sue Rockne, a well respected and legendary lobbyist and advocate for women's rights. Kathy will be close to the action, giving MN NOW some crucial visibility at the Capitol. She will be following some of MN NOW's key issues this year: anti-choice legislation, covenant marriage, and the unicameral issue, among others. The benefits of her contribution are apparent in her issue briefs, which you may link to below or from our Legislative Update page or the MN NOW Site Map.  I am particularly grateful for the commitment of the Committee members who are making it all happen.

Now it is time for all MN NOW's members to contribute to our legislative efforts! This year's legislative agenda is being carried out primarily through a grassroots lobbying strategy. That means if our members don't act, then our message does not reach the people that need to hear it - our elected officials. It is the sound of many voices raised together that will reach a volume the Governor and legislators cannot ignore. So my request of the membership is this:
  >Start small. 
  >Don't think you have to act on every Action Alert we issue - you may be overwhelmed.
  >Choose one or two issues that are close to your heart and do whatever you can.
  >Make a call to the Governor, write a letter to your state Senator or Representative.
  >Post the Action Alert at work.  Pass it along to family & friends. Urge others to take action.

Whatever you do, please take some sort of action.  Your voice may be the one that achieves the critical mass to change a bill this year. And if you are one of the few who have the time and energy to act on each and every Action Alert that MN NOW puts out, then let me know what kind of coffee you're drinking!

A note about Action Alerts:

They will be released most frequently on this web site and to those signed up on the MN NOW Email Activist List.  You can sign up by emailing MN NOW. Help those without Internet access to keep up-to-date on actions or encourage them to contact the MN NOW office at (651)-222-1605.  Less frequently, Action Alerts will be sent out in the mail.  In mid-March this year's second Legislative Newsletter will be coming out.

MN NOW's Legislative Issues:

Choice:
Late-term abortion is not being addressed as of yet in this session.  "A Women's Right to Know" is the main vehicle for abortion restrictions being sought by Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL). "Right to Know" legislation requires that women seeking an abortion view materials about abortion (which is already done by clinics in Minnesota) and then the woman must wait 24 hours after viewing the material to get an abortion.

"Informed Consent" and "24 Hour Waiting Periods" are the other terms that are used for this legislation.  MCCL is rumored to be trying to add "Right to Know" abortion restriction language to the Newborns' Bill that allows women to drop off their unwanted babies at medical facilities without prosecution.

A bill (SF2733) was recently introduced that prohibits doctors from telling women of any characteristics of their unborn fetus found through genetic testing, ultrasound, amniocentesis, etc. that could incite an abortion.

Actions: Contact legislators, tell them you oppose "Right to Know" legislation because the information is already being provided to women seeking abortion and the 24 hour waiting period creates an unacceptable restriction on abortion.

Additionally, tell them you support the Newborns' Bill, but ONLY if it is free of abortion restriction language.

Ask them to oppose SF 2733, because prohibiting doctors from informing patients about the status of the fetus is clearly unethical and denies women the benefits of medical technology in making informed medical decisions.

Contact Gov. Ventura and commend him for his strong Pro-Choice stance. Ask him to oppose "Right to Know" legislation because it restricts women's right to Choice.

Violence Against Women:
Office for the Prevention of Violence Against Women (OPVAW) compromise:
The bill (SF2980) This bill is for the creation of a Department of Crime Prevention within the Department of Public Safety (DPS). Senator Junge was initially pushing for a specific state Office for Prevention of Violence Against Women (OPVAW) but a compromise between Senator Junge, DPS, and women's advocates resulted in the current bill which passed unanimously through the Senate Crime Prevention Committee. The compromise was struck because of the high likelihood that if the OPVAW passed through both houses, Governor Ventura would veto it because, in this bonding session, no new appropriations would be made to support the office.

MN NOW previously took the following related positions:
Position 1. Reorganization of Crime Victim Services.  MN NOW opposes Governor Ventura's Reorganization Order #182 insofar as it has circumvented the legislative process and has silenced women's voices in the leadership and monitoring of victim services in the state.  

Position 2. Office for the Prevention of Violence Against Women (OPVAW).   MN NOW endorses the creation of a state OPVAW to provide women with one specialized office that gives violence against women top priority, thereby ensuring full participation of Minnesota women in the continued leadership, accountability, and direction of victim services for women.

What does all this mean in light of MN NOW's positions on Reorganization Order #182 and the OPVAW?  This compromise legislation answers some of MN NOW's concerns regarding each of these issues.  Specifically, this legislation:
  >reinstates the grassroots women's role in state victim services by providing specialized staff and resources within DPS to address violence against women;
  >it establishes an interagency task force on domestic violence and sexual assault prevention which provides an initial first step in better coordination among state agencies; and
  >it reinstates power to the advisory councils that had been greatly reduced under the initial reorganization.

Ultimately, MN NOW would still like to see a state OPVAW created, but that is an unlikely outcome this year.  It may be something we want to pursue next year.

Actions: Call/write to your state Senator and ask your senator to support Senator Junge's crime prevention bill (SF2980) because it promotes focused attention and resources on issues of domestic and sexual violence.  FFI: SF2980 Action Alert of 02-20-2000

A companion House bill (HF3331) will go to the House Crime Prevention Committee March 2nd at 10 am. From there it will go to the House Government Operations Committee. All bills have to be through committee by the 10th in the House.

Actions:
Call or email House Crime Prevention Committee members by Monday, March 6th to ask members to support crime prevention bill (HF3331) because it promotes focused attention and resources on issues of domestic and sexual violence.  FFI: HF3331 Action Alert of 03-01-00

Domestic Abuse Civil Remedies Act (SF11/HF47): These bills create a civil action specifically for domestic abuse. The statute of limitations for similar actions is two years.  This bill extends that time frame to six years, which means the victim/survivor may bring a lawsuit up to six years after the domestic abuse incident for which she is suing. This extension is important for battered women because it may take longer than two years for many women to get to a point in their lives when they can take this kind of action.

Actions: Contact state Senators and state Representatives and ask them to support the Domestic Abuse Civil Remedies Act (SF11/HF47).

Restraining Order Fee Waiver Elimination/Amended Definition of Harassment (HF2516/SF3580):  This bill, authored by Rep. Steve Smith (R-Mound) and backed by the Minnesota Supreme Court, eliminates the waiver of the $120 restraining order filing fee.  Low-income people may still file in forma pauperis which removes filing fees. However, this requires additional paper work and is an extra step in the process of obtaining a restraining  order.

The stated reason for eliminating this waiver is to cut down on the number of "frivolous" restraining order cases - primarily targeting "nuisance" lawsuits among neighbors, for example. However, the practical result of this bill will be that many women will be prevented from seeking restraining orders when they are victims of stalking or harassment (there is an exception that preserves the waiver for cases of domestic abuse).

There is another portion of the bill that changes the definition of harassment which does greatly benefit women. The bill proposes an amendment of current law which requires multiple instances of harassing behavior, to also allow for a single incident of harassment that has a significant adverse effect on another. A situation where this new definition would benefit women is sexual assault. Survivors could obtain restraining orders against perpetrators under this amended definition of harassment.

Action: Contact your legislators; express your concerns about the bill, and your support for the expanded definition of harassment.

Parenting Plan Bill (SF2473/HF2527) (Sen. Knutson R-Burnsville/Rep. Biernat DFL-Mpls.): The bill allows parents in a sole child custody case to agree on their own standard of proof for a modification of the custody order.  It would make sole custody cases the same as the rule in joint custody cases. This bill presents particular dangers for custodial parents who are unrepresented by an attorney at the time of the initial custody matter, as well as battered women because there would be pressure to negotiate a lower standard for modifying the custody order. 

Action: Contact your legislators to ask them to oppose the Parenting Plan Bill.

Economic Justice Issues (go to 3-1-00 update below):
MFIP Sanctions: Bills in both the House and Senate have been introduced to impose 100% sanctions on MFIP, MN Family Investment Program (welfare) recipients who are not in compliance with work requirements. Current Minnesota law allows up to 30% sanction for non-compliance. Sanctions should not be raised because a 100% sanction would fundamentally undermine perhaps the most important goal of MFIP - reducing child poverty. There is significant evidence showing that current sanction policy is often implemented in an inconsistent and inaccurate manner and that a large percentage of participants in sanction status have barriers that should qualify them for an exemption from MFIP work requirements.  Given this evidence, a full family sanction policy would make the consequences of inconsistent implementation all the more dramatic, while failing to address the participant's barriers to compliance.

Action: Contact legislators in both the House and Senate and let them know that you oppose 100% sanctions for MFIP participants.  (See also MFIP Sanctions Action Alert.)

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Reserve Spending: As discussed in the 1-3-00 Legislative Newsletter, concerns about using the surplus money from Minnesota's federal welfare grant - the TANF reserve - have been pleasantly answered with a promising proposal by the Ventura administration. Ventura's proposal for spending the $173 million in TANF reserve includes a stated goal to use the money to help hard-to-employ families move from welfare to work. Specifics include:
  >$55 million for a program to fund additional job training, intervention services, assistance
for chemical dependency and mental health, and child care and transportation assistance;  
  >$83 million to address the housing needs of low-income families including a notable elimination of a provision that requires MFIP participants to count a portion of their public housing benefits as income, thereby reducing their MFIP grant; and
  >$23 million to allow child support payments (now retained by state and federal government to offset welfare payments) to be passed on to MFIP participants.

Action: Call Governor Ventura to applaud his plan to spend the TANF reserve to help Minnesota families move from welfare to work. Call state Senators and Representatives to ask them to support any bills that further the Governor's proposed plan for using the TANF reserve.  Stress your support for the provision in Governor Ventura's plan that focuses on affordable housing, and express that even more should be done to provide affordable housing to low-income people. (See also TANF Action Alert 1 & TANF Action Alert 2.) (There will be an article in upcoming MN NOW Times explaining why affordable housing is a women's issue.)

Affirmative Options Coalition Legislative Update of 03-01-00 (Welfare Reform)
This 03-01-00 update does not include an Action Alert, so you can rest yourselves until next week.

MFIP Sanctions & TANF Reserve Spending
Welfare reform legislation has been heard in both Senate and House policy committees. This legislation will now advance to the finance committees of the respective bodies. Below is a summary of the major provisions in the legislation. This is not a complete summary, but highlights the issues Affirmative Options considers to be of most importance. The 100% sanction proposal was defeated in the Senate but is moving ahead in the House. Legislators have heard extensively from constituents in opposition to these measures. Thank you for your calls, letters and meetings. They're making a difference.

House Legislation
HF3599 (Goodno) contains the Governor's proposals for various initiatives that use federal TANF funds (see February 14 Action Alert). It was forwarded to Health and Human Services Finance without recommendation. It will most likely not be heard by Finance. The vehicle for TANF spending, then, will be the amended HF3128 below.

HF3128 (Goodno) contains recommendations to increase sanctions to 100%. In an extensive "delete-all" amendment to the bill, Goodno added some provisions to his sanction proposal and his own TANF spending provisions, which are different in important respects from the Governor's proposal. An amendment to delete the bill's language and replace it with the Governor's language in 3599 (which includes no sanction increase) was voted down (11-9) on a party-line vote. The bill was approved as amended and forwarded to Health and Human Services Finance. It includes:

* 100% sanctions for MFIP families after the fifth occurrence (or month) of noncompliance. It requires a case file review (by someone other than a participant's job counselor), a face-to-face meeting and an administrative fair hearing before such a 100% sanction can occur. There is no safety net provision included for the children of disqualified families.
* Distributes all current child support payments directly to MFIP participants, like the Governor's proposal. Unlike HF3599, however, it does not disregard 50% of the payment in calculating MFIP eligibility and benefit amounts.
* Establishes a Local Intervention for Self Sufficiency grant program to provide additional funding to counties for hard-to-employ participants. It is different from the Governor's proposal in its accountability and distribution mechanisms. It also does not specify an appropriation amount.
* Specifies that Adult Basic Education (ABE) activities or English as a Second Language (ESL) classes can be included in a job search support plan for no more than half of the required 30 hours per week of job search.  Limits the approval of ESL activities to participants who are below a certain spoken language proficiency level (SPL5). Limits ESL activities to a total of 24 months. Requires that by the fourth month of employment and training services, at least half of a participants required hours of work activity are met through one or more of five work-focused activities.
* Creates a grant program to reduce the risk of out-of-wedlock pregnancies among youth who are in prostitution or at risk of prostitution and appropriates $5 million.
* Does not include the elimination of the $100 housing penalty for participants living in subsidized housing.

HF3589 (McElroy) contains the Governor's $54.5 million for affordable housing proposal. It has not yet been heard. Disturbingly, it appears to be encountering opposition from House leadership. (Stay tuned for an action alert on this bill.)

Senate Legislation
SF3341 (Samuelson) contains the Governor's TANF proposal. In a delete-all amendment, Sen. Samuelson added proposals included in SF2834, which include 100% sanctions. In an amendment authored by Sen. Hottinger, all of the language to increase sanctions was successfully deleted on a voice vote.  Sen. Samuelson was joined by Sen. Robertson and Sen. Kiscaden in opposition to the deletion. The bill was approved as amended and sent to the Budget Division. It includes:

* All of the Governor's TANF proposals, including the 50% disregard of the child support pass-through and the elimination of the $100 housing penalty.
* A provision originally in SF2834 to continue food assistance to legal immigrants.
* A transfer of $15 million from the state's TANF block grant to the state's Title XX block grant to serve families with children at incomes under 200% of poverty.

In addition, Sen. Berglin authored several amendments that make changes to the initial and secondary assessment process and establish separate programs in which assistance received by participants will not count against their 60 month time clock. These provisions include:

* A more thorough review in the initial assessment of possible exemptions from the MFIP work requirements and requirement of a professional assessment in the secondary assessment for individuals with mental health or chemical abuse problems. The job counselor must ensure that appropriate services are available to meet the needs identified in the assessment.
* A supported work project to be piloted in the three MN counties with the largest MFIP caseloads. The project will include wage subsidies to participants and individualized case management and supportive services in order for participants to obtain and retain employment.
* The establishment of "noncash assistance" programs in which participants in training or education, working participants, and participants taking care of special needs children receive assistance that does not count toward their 60 month time clock.

SF3389 (Janezich) is the companion to HF3589 appropriating money for affordable housing. It has not yet been heard, but it appears to have strong support from Senate leadership.

Healthcare:
Maternity Benefits Bill (Rep. Opatz DFL-St. Cloud): This bill prohibits waiting periods for insurance coverage for maternity benefits. Under current MN law many health insurance policies may require a waiting period up to 18 months from the time of initial coverage before the policy would cover maternity benefits (the costs of delivering a baby, hospital stay, etc.). This bill came very close to passing in the legislature last year - thanks, in large part to MN NOW's former lobbyist, Susal Stebbins. Let's get this one through!

Action: Call your legislators to ask them to support this pro-woman/pro-child legislation.

Ovarian Cancer Test/Healing Touch Insurance Coverage Bill (HF2581) (Rep. Karen Clark DFL-Mpls.): This bill would require that health insurance cover routine blood test screening for ovarian cancer, which can be a virulent form of cancer that often goes undetected. The bill also requires insurance coverage for a form of therapy called "healing touch." The benefits of this therapy is that it stimulates the immune system to help your body naturally fight off disease.

Action: Call your state Representatives and ask them to support women's health by supporting this bill.

Unicameral Legislature: Refer to Issue Brief.
Position:  MN NOW opposes legislation establishing a Unicameral Legislature.

Covenant Marriage: Refer to Issue Brief.
Position:  MN NOW opposes the Covenant Marriage Option Bill (SF0883 Sen. Steve Dille). 

Top of Page

Legislative Update

HOME

mailto:info@mnnow.org

© 2000 Minnesota NOW