| Winter 1999-2000 Affordable Housing: An important Minnesota NOW issue "Millionaire" wedding makes a mockery of marriage Response to unicameral legislature proposal Response to covenant marriage proposal Call to conference: Is Minnesota nice? Analyzing victim services consolidation State PAC endorses five candidates Friends and colleagues honor Susal Stebbins
|
Analyzing victim services consolidation Shake-up in state crime victim services creates push for separate state Office for the Prevention of Violence Against Women By Rachel Callanan, MN NOW Legislative Coordinator Governor Venturas Reorganization Order #182, issued in November 1999, transferred the Minnesota Center for Crime Victim Services (MCCVS) from the Dept. of Corrections (DOC) to the Dept. of Public Safety (DPS). This reorganization has resulted in the silencing of womens voices in the areas of domestic violence and sexual assault victim services. Charlie Weaver, DPS Commissioner, has restructured the MCCVS, making it more bureaucratic than its formerly grassroots oriented structure under DOC. Among other questionable outcomes of the Reorganization, the most harmful to Minnesota women was DPS initial elimination of the legislatively mandated Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Advisory Councils. Although these councils were reinstated after intense pressure from battered womens and sexual assault programs across the state, their powers were greatly reduced thereby taking hard-won control of victim services for women away from the grassroots battered womens and sexual assault movements that built this office and these councils. Control has been put into the hands of Charlie Weaver and the DPS. Some battered womens groups, most notably the 10 members of a coalition called the Domestic Violence Legislative Alliance, have decided not to fight the Reorganization Order and work with DPS to implement the reorganization fairly with womens interests at the fore. This Alliance also has some reservations about the creation of the OPVAW. Articles from both sides of the debate follow this article. MN NOWs positions: MN NOWs stated purpose is to take action to bring women into full participation in the mainstream of American society now, exercising all privileges and responsibilities thereof in truly equal partnership with men. Reorganization Order #182 greatly interferes with these goals and the OPVAW advances us towards achieving these goals. MN NOW, through action by the Executive Committee, has adopted the following positions on each of these issues: Reorganization of Victim Services: MN NOW opposes Gov. Venturas Reorganization Order #182 insofar as it has circumvented the legislative process and has silenced womens voices in the leadership and monitoring of victim services in the state. Office for the Prevention of Violence Against Women: MN NOW endorses the creation of a state Office for the Prevention of Violence Against Women (OPVAW) to provide women with one specialized office that gives violence against women top priority, thereby ensuring full participation of Minnesota women in the continued leadership, accountability, and direction of victim services for women. MN NOWs positions to oppose the Reorganization and to support the creation of the OPVAW do not preclude us from working with the DPS if the Reorganization remains in place. MN NOW, by opposing the Order, is making clear to the Governor and others that womens voices should not be sacrificed in a push to streamline government and furthermore, the creation of the OPVAW would bolster womens important grassroots role in the administration of state victim services. Domestic Violence Legislative Alliance Questions and Answers on Victim Services consolidation issues 1. What is the Alliances position on the Governors Reorganization Order 182? 2. Does the Alliance support the proposed Violence Against Women office and/or the appointment of a public spokesperson on these issues? 3. Does the Alliance support the consolidation of domestic violence and sexual assault programs into a Violence Against Women office or the creation of a broad-based crime victims office? 4. If a Violence Against Women Office was created, where should it be located in state government? 5. In the Alliances view, would issues of violence against women he held more accountable with the appointment of a public spokesperson? |